NAFEMS International Journal of CFD Case Studies

Volume 11, April 2016

ISSN 1462-236X

Digital Prototyping Methodology for Cyclonic Multiphase Flow Separation

A M Kulkarni¹, M Kulkarni¹, P More¹ and S Showalter^2
1Eaton Technologies Pvt. Ltd., India
²Eaton Corporation, USA

https://doi.org/10.59972/zbwl6jwx

Keywords: Multiphase, Cyclone Separator, Flow Field and Complex Flow

Abstract

Safety and reliability are fundamental requirements for gas turbine engines. Continuous health monitoring and diagnostics devices are prime enablers for the same, and gaining a lot of attention for advancements. Oil debris monitoring is one of the important elements of an engine condition monitoring system. The cyclone separator is the key component of the debris monitoring system which separates air, oil and solid particles. The separation efficiency of various phases determines the cyclone performance and is governed by highly turbulent swirling flow field. Further, the particle capture efficiency depends on successful capturing of the flow field. Cyclone performance enhancement requires a detailed understanding of turbulent swirling multiphase flow field with free and forced vortex interactions. This poses a significant challenge for physical prototyping and demands detailed computational models to resolve the anisotropic structure of a turbulent flow field with multiphase interaction. Detailed investigation of various computational models such as turbulence models, multiphase models, and drag models has been carried out to capture the complex flow physics. A structured computational approach helped to establish a CFD methodology having a close match with experimental findings for all the performance parameters of three phase separation. The methodology is validated with the experimental results with the variation between CFD and experiments observed to be less than 10% for all four performance parameters namely pressure drop, air separation efficiency, oil separation efficiency and particle capture efficiency.

References

J Bergstrom, H Vomhoff, Experimental hydrocyclone flow field studies - Separation and Purification Technology 53 (2007) 8–20

K. Udaya Bhaskar, Y Rama Murthy, M Ravi Raju, Sumit Tiwari, J K Srivastava, N Ramakrishnan, CFD simulation and experimental validation studies on hydrocyclone – Mineral Engineering 20(2007) 60-71

B Chine, F Concha, Flow patterns in conical and cylindrical hydrocyclones – Chemical Engineering Journal 80 (2000) 267-273

J.C. Cullivan, R.A. Williams and C.R. Cross, Understanding the cyclone separator through computational fluid dynamics – Institution of Chemical Engineers Trans IChemE, Vol 81, Part A, April 2003

M. J. Fisher, R.D. Flack, Velocity distributions in a hydrocyclone separator – Experiments in Fluids 32 (2002)302-312

K.T. Hsieh and K. Rajamani, Phenomenological Model of the Hydrocyclone :Model Development and Verification for Single-Phase Flow - International Journal of Mineral Processing, 22 (1988) 223-237

D F Kelsall, A study of motion of solid particle in a hydraulic cyclone – Trans. Inst. Chem. 30 (1952) 87-108

T.C. Monredon, K.T. Hsieh, R.K. Rajamani, Fluid flow of the hydrocyclone : An investigation of device dimensions - Int. J. Miner. Process. 35 (1992)

M. Narasimha, R. Sripriya, P.K. Banerjee, CFD Modeling of hydrocyclone-prediction of cut size – International Journal of Mineral Processing 75(2005) 53-68

G Solero, A Coghe, Experimental fluid dynamic characterization of a cyclone chamber – Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 27(2002) 87-96

Cite this paper

A M Kulkarni, M Kulkarni, P More, S Showalter, Digital Prototyping Methodology for Cyclonic Multiphase Flow Separation, NAFEMS International Journal of CFD Case Studies, Volume 11, 2016, Pages 59-73, https://doi.org/10.59972/zbwl6jwx