This Website is not fully compatible with Internet Explorer.
For a more complete and secure browsing experience please consider using Microsoft Edge, Firefox, or Chrome

Numerical and Experimental Stability Analysis Predicting Natural Laminar Flow Extension on a Realistic Swept Wing

NAFEMS International Journal of CFD Case Studies

Volume 12, February 2020

ISSN 1462-236X
ISBN 978-1-910643-94-5


Numerical and Experimental Stability Analysis Predicting Natural Laminar Flow Extension on a Realistic Swept Wing

Dr. D. de Rosa1, Dr. R. S. Donelli1, D. G. Romano2
1Centro Italiano Ricerche Aerospaziali (CIRA), Italy, 2Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A., Italy

https://doi.org/10.59972/0ju4twsp

Keywords: CFD, experimental, Euler, laminar, RANS, stability


Abstract

It is well known that the stability theory, coupled with eN method, offers a rational approach to predict transition from laminar to turbulent flow condition in several aerodynamic applications. It is also known that stability analyses are affected by the accuracy of the mean flow that strongly depends from an adequate resolution in the boundary layer region. Unfortunately, Navier-Stokes analyses for stability investigations are often not affordable since the large number of points normal to the wall, necessary in the viscous layer to have desiderata boundary layer accuracy, makes RANS computations extremely time consuming. Furthermore, the classical definition of the boundary layer edge (the height where the boundary layer velocity reaches 99% of the no-viscous velocity) is not a straightforward task. For these reasons, in the framework of EU-funded Research Project RECEPT, a three-step approach has been applied to perform stability analyses. first step consists of Euler computations to evaluate the mean flow. In the second step, a 3-D boundary-layer code, starting from the no-viscous flow field, allows to compute the boundary layer data necessary to perform the linear stability analysis and, finally, a 2.5D linear stability code is used to predict transition location.

The reference geometry used to test this approach is the laminar wing developed by CIRA and Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A. (PAI) in the framework of an Italian national program called VITAS (Vettore Innovativo per il Trasporto AeroSostenibile). This wing has been selected because an extended set of experimental data is available.

Among the available experimental results, four different conditions have been selected and numerical analyses were performed. The selection has been driven preferring the data that presented both the best IR (Infra-Red) camera results and the pressure distributions.

Euler computations have been performed using the commercial CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamic) code CFD++ and the boundary layer computations have been performed using the ONERA (Office National d'Études et de Recherches Aérospatiales) 3C3D laminar/turbulent boundary layer code.

Stability computations have been performed using the compressible code NOLLI (NOn Local Linear Instability code) developed in house by CIRA and based on the application of the multiple scale technique and ray tracing theory. For stability analyses the fixed span- wise wavenumber strategy has been used.

References

[1] RECEPT official web page: https://www.mech.kth.se/

[2] Cella U., Quagliarella D., Donelli R. S., Imperatore B. (2010). Design and Test of the UW-5006 Transonic Natural-Laminar-Flow Wing, Journal of Aircraft Vol. 47, No. 3, May–June 2010, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.40932.

[3] Metacomp Technologies Inc. CFD++ v10.1.2 R1 – User Manual

[4] Houdeville R., Descriptif et mode d’emploi du code 3C3D, 3C3D Manual, ONERA

[5] de Matteis P., Donelli R. S., Luchini P. (1995). Application of the Ray-Tracing Theory to the Stability Analysis of the Three-Dimensional Incompressible Boundary Layer. Atti del XIII congresso nazionale A.I.D.A.A.,(Associazione Italiana di Aeronautica ed Astronautica Roma, 11-15 Settembre 1995).

[6] Donelli R. S., Mazzotti G., Luchini P. (2006). Application of the ray-tracing theory to the stability analysis of three-dimensional compressible boundary layer, 6th Euromech Fluid Mechanics Conference, Stockholm, KTH Mechanics June 26-30, 2006.

[7] Donelli R. S., Luchini P. (2001). New and Emerging Techniques for Transition Prediction, ERCOFTAC SIG 33 Workshop, Ravello, Italy, April 27-28 April, 2000, ERCOFTAC Bulletin, N. 48, March 2001.

[8] Menter, F. R. (1993). Zonal Two Equation - Turbulence Models for Aerodynamic Flows. AIAA-93-2906.

[9] de Rosa D., Donelli R. S., Romano D. G. (2013), Validation of experimental results of a realistic natural laminar swept wing through advanced stability methods. NAFEMS 2013, Salzburg.

[10] Drela M. (1995). A User's Guide to MSES 2.9. MIT Computational Aerospace Sciences Laboratory.

[11] Arnal, D., Habiballah, M., and Coutols, E. (1984). Théorie de l’Instabilité Laminaire et Critéres de Transition en Éncoulement bi et Tridimensionnel. Recherche Aérospatiale, No. 2, 1984, pp. 125–143.

[12] Casalis, G., Arnal, D. (1996). ELFIN II, Subtask 2.3: Data base method. Development and validation of the simplified method for pure crossflow instability at low speed. CERT/ONERA Report 119/5618.16, 1996.

[13] Arnal, D. and Dupè, C. (1992). Data base method. ELFIN I final report, 1992.

[14] Perraud, J., Arnal, D., Casalis, G., Archambaud, J. P. and Donelli, R. S. (2009). Automatic Transition Predictions Using Simplified Methods. AIAA Journal, vol. 47, No. 11, pp 2676-2684, November 2009, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.42990

[15] Kaups, K. and Cebeci, T. (1976). Compressible Laminar Boundary Layer with Suction on swept and tapered wings. McDonnell-Douglas Corporation, MDC Report J7337, 1976.

[16] Van Ingen J. L. (1956), A suggested semi–empirical method for the calculation of the boundary layer transition region. Tech. Rep. VTH-74, University of Technology, Delft, 1956.

[17] Smith A., Gamberoni N. (1956), Transition, pressure gradient and stability theory. Douglas Aircraft Company, 1956.

[18] Mack L. M. (1984). Boundary layer stability theory, special course on stability and transition of laminar flow. Technical Report 709, AGARD Report, 1984.

[19] Catalano P., Iuliano E., Donelli R.S., Panizza A. (2009). A numerical procedure for predicting transition in a RANS environment. XX AIDAA Congress, Milano, Italy, June 29-July 3, 2009.

[20] de Rosa D., Donelli R.S., Vassallo C., De Nicola C. (2014). Transition prediction and Implementation in RANS Solvers. 6th. European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ECFD VI), Barcelona 20 - 25 July 2014.

[21] Russo S., de Rosa D., de Nicola C., Donelli R.S. (2015). The use of RANS approach for predicting transition. 23rd Conference of the Italian Association of Aeronautics and Astronautics AIDAA2015.

[22] R.S. Donelli, D. De Rosa (2016). Stability analysis of three-dimensional laminar compressible boundary layers based on ray-tracing theory and multiple scale technique. Journal of Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio, Vol. 95, No 4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404732.

[23] Donelli R.S., de Rosa D. (2015). Stability analysis of three-dimensional laminar compressible boundary layer based on ray-tracing theory and multiple scale approach. 23rd Conference of the Italian Association of Aeronautics and Astronautics AIDAA 2015.

Document Details

ReferenceCFDJ12-4
Authorsde Rosa. D Donelli. R Romano. D
LanguageEnglish
TypeJournal Article
Date 2nd February 2020
OrganisationsCIRA Piaggio

Download

Purchase Download

Order RefCFDJ12-4 Download
Non-member Price £5.00 | $6.33 | €6.02

Back to Previous Page