Volume 4, January 2004
ISSN 1462-236X
J Shaikh
Intelligent Fluid Solutions Ltd., 127 Crookston Road, London SE9 1YF
https://doi.org/10.59972/grz5jq8h
Keywords: Industrial CFD, Simulation, Framework, AIAA, Qualification, Verification and Validation
The central tenet of this paper is that there is no fixed level of credibility or accuracy that is applicable to all CFD simulations. The required level of accuracy is dependent on the industrial context for the work. This paper describes a framework suggested by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics [1] designed to aid the assessment of the credibility of CFD simulations. The framework distinguishes between Reality, the Conceptual Model of Reality and the Computational CFD model. The processes of Qualification, Verification and Validation are used to assess the levels of Error and Uncertainty within the simulation system. The methodology presented is not exhaustive and is intended to act as a guideline for the assessment of Industrial CFD simulations.
[1] Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA G-077-1998.
Marco Schikorra, Michael Schomäcker, Matthias Kleiner, Numerical Analysis of Material Flow in Continuously Reinforced Extrusion of Profiles, NAFEMS International Journal of CFD Case Studies, Volume 4, 2004, Pages 15-25, https://doi.org/10.59972/grz5jq8h
Reference | CFDJ4-2 |
---|---|
Author | Shaikh. J |
Language | English |
Type | Journal Article |
Date | 5th January 2004 |
Organisation | Intelligent Fluid Solutions |
Order Ref | CFDJ4-2 Download |
---|---|
Non-member Price | £5.00 | $6.34 | €6.00 |
Stay up to date with our technology updates, events, special offers, news, publications and training
If you want to find out more about NAFEMS and how membership can benefit your organisation, please click below.
Joining NAFEMS© NAFEMS Ltd 2024
Developed By Duo Web Design